Legal Opinion

Parker v. Otis

California Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1900No. S.F. No. 1533PublishedCited by 24 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. William E. Daingerfield, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Action to recover four hundred and seventy dollars alleged to have been paid to defendants by plaintiff for the purchase of stocks of mining corporations on margin. The cause was tried by the court sitting with a jury, and plaintiff had the verdict. The appeal is from the judgment and from an order denying defendants' motion for a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex parte Smith & KeatingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Sheehy v. ShinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Cashman v. RootCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Baldwin v. ZadigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Kullman v. SimmensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Davenport v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Lelande v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Pollitz v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Willcox v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. State v. Fairmont Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API