Baldwin v. Zadig
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
This cause involves similar questions to those presented in Kullmann v. Simmens, post, p. 595, this day decided, and the other cases therein referred to. The agreement between the parties in Wetmore v. Barrett, 103 Cal. 246, included all the terms of the agreement under which the transactions between the plaintiff and defendant herein were had, and nearly all the points presented on this appeal were presented and considered in that case. The court, however, erred in the present case in allowing interest to the plaintiff upon the several sums of money which she paid to the defendants. This…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wetmore v. BarrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by8 opinions
- Willcox v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Parker v. OtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Holt v. LucasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- George J. Birkel Co. v. HowzeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.