Legal Opinion

Ex parte Smith & Keating

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1869PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sanderson, J., delivered the following opinion :

The return of the officer to whom these writs were directed, shows that the petitioners are in his custody by virtue of final process, issued from the Police Court of the City of Sacramento, which process is set out - in full in the return, and shows that the petitioners have been convicted in that Court of the violation of a city ordinance, entitled “Ordinance No. 91, to prohibit noisy amusements and to prevent immorality,” and sentenced to pay a fine of ten dollars each, and, in default of payment, to be imprisoned for the space of five days…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Smith v. Judge of the Twelfth DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Brooks v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. People ex rel. Daniels v. HenshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. McGlothlen v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Ex parte TuttleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Baker v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API