Sheehy v. Shinn
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
This is an action. founded upon the following clause of section 26 of article IY of the constitution of 1879:
“All contracts for the sale of shares of the capital stock of any corporation or association, on margin, or to be delivered at a future day, shall be void, and any money paid on such contracts may be recovered by the party paying it by suit in any court of competent jurisdiction.”
The plaintiff sues to recover money alleged to have been paid to defendant upon contracts for the sale of stocks “on margin.” The cause was tried in the superior court without a jury, and on the facts found…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cashman v. RootCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by23 opinions
- Pollitz v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Hammond v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Proposition 103 Enforcement Project v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- McLean v. FickeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- State Ex Rel. Stafford v. Fox-Great Falls Theatre Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1942
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.