Legal Opinion

State v. Fairmont Creamery Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 27, 1925No. 24,318PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

The defendant was convicted before a justice of the peace of Cottonwood county of the violation of L. 1923, p. 120, c. 120, now embodied in G. S. 1923, § 3907, reading as follows:

“Any person, firm, copartnership or corporation engaged in the business of buying milk, cream or butterfat for manufacture or for sale of such milk, cream or butterfat who shall discriminate between different sections, localities, communities or cities of this state, by purchasing such commodity at a higher price or rate in one locality than is paid for the same commodity by said person, firm, copartnership or…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Fairmont Creamery Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. State Ex Rel. v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Minneapolis Gas Co. v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. State ex rel. Beery v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Bohannon v. DuncanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API