Legal Opinion
Willcox v. Edwards
California Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 1912No. S. F. 5313; S. F. 5314; S. F. 5315PublishedCited by 43 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
After the decision of these cases in Department a rehearing was granted for the purpose of considering further the effect of the omission from the constitutional enactment of November 3, 1908 (art. IV, sec. 26), of the provision whereby money paid on certain prohibited contracts might be recovered. As there is no difference of opinion regarding some of the matters discussed in the opinion of the Department, written by Mr. Justice Shaw, a portion thereof is hereby adopted as follows:—
“In each of the above entitled causes a general demurrer to the amended complaint was sustained, the…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Ewell v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Louisiana Ex Rel. Folsom v. Mayor and Administrators of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Bartlet v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
- New York & Oswego Midland Railroad v. Van HornNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Garrison v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Coombes v. GetzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Krause v. RarityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Goehring v. Chapman UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.