Legal Opinion
Vun Im v. Metropolitan Property & Liability Insurance
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided June 8, 1994PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Sherman, PJ.
This is an action in contract to recover G.L.c. 90, §34M Personal Injury Protection (“PIP”) benefits under a motor vehicle insurance policy issued to the plaintiff by defendant Metropolitan Property and Liability Insurance Company (“Metropolitan”). The plaintiff has appealed the allowance of Metropolitan’s Dist./ Mun. Cts. R. Civ. R, Rule 56 motion for summary judgment.
The pleadings, affidavits and other Rule 56 materials submitted by the parties indicate the following: On November 10, 1992, the plaintiff sustained bodily injuries when a motor vehicle owned by him, and in which he…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Attorney General v. BaileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Cody v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Jefferson Insurance Co. of New York v. City of HolyokeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
- Sorensen v. SorensenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Khudisman v. CNA InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
- Ny v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1998
- Velasquez v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1995
- Shah v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
- Miller v. Amica Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.