Legal Opinion
Velasquez v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided June 27, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMerrick, J.
Plaintiff Ernesto Velasquez brought this action under G.L.c. 90, §34M to recover Personal Injury Protection (“PIP”) benefits and attorney’s fees. A default judgment was entered against the defendant-insurer, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (“Liberty”), and Liberty thereafter brought this Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A 8A “Expedited Appeal” to challenge the court’s assessment of damages.
The plaintiff was injured on May 9, 1994 in a motor vehicle accident. At the time of the accident, the plaintiff had a Massachusetts Automobile Insurance Policy, issued by Liberty, which included PIP coverage with…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Perkins School for the Blind v. Rate Setting CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Town of Lexington v. Town of BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Damiano v. National Grange Mutual Liability Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Scalia v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1995
- Buffum v. Town of RockportMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fascione v. CNA Insurance CompaniesMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1997
- Hendry v. Broadway Foods, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1998
- Shorr v. Professional Photographers of America, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1997
- Advanced Spine Centers, Inc. v. Pilgrim InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010