Legal Opinion
Khudisman v. CNA Insurance
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided August 4, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCoven, J.
This is a G.L.c. 94, §34M action to recover Personal Injury Protection (“PIP”) benefits. Summary judgment was entered for the plaintiff, and the defendant-insurer has appealed pursuant to Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A., Rule 8A.
On July 15, 1998, plaintiff Mikhail Khudisman sustained injuries in a motor vehicle accident while driving his wife’s car, which was insured by defendant CNA Insurance Company (“CNA”). The plaintiff incurred medical expenses in the total amount of $3,970.00 for treatment provided by Broadway Chiropractic (“Broadway”), and properly submitted a PIP claim with supporting…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Madsen v. ErwinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Yorke Management v. CastroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Cullen Enterprises, Inc. v. Massachusetts Property Insurance Underwriting Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- TLT Construction Corp. v. A. Anthony Tappe & Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
- White v. University of Massachusetts at BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Arbit v. Amica Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002
- Commonwealth Mutual Insurance v. VigoritoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2003
- Golden v. New England Horsemen's Benevolent Ass'nMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2003
- Brighton Physical Therapy, Inc. v. One Beacon InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2011
- Seletsky v. RuizMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002