Legal Opinion
Shah v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided July 24, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMerrick, P.J.
This is a G.Lc. 90, §34M action by a medical provider to recover Personal Injury Protection (“PIP”) benefits from his patient’s automobile insurance carrier for tiie difference between the amount he billed for his services and the amount of the health insurance payments he received pursuant to his “participating provider” agreement with his patienf s health insurer. After trial, judgment was entered for the defendant, and the plaintiff filed this Dist/Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A., Rule 8C, appeal.
Rafael Santiago (“Santiago”) suffered injuries in an automobile accident while a passenger in a vehicle…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Columbia Chiropractic Group, Inc. v. Trust InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Dominguez v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Bombardieri v. Registrar of Motor VehiclesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Nercessian v. Board of Appeal on Motor Vehicle Liability Policies & BondsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
- Vun Im v. Metropolitan Property & Liability InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Amari v. Amica InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2003
- Salafia v. Trust InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
- New England Sports Therapy, Inc. v. Metlife Auto & HomeMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2013