Legal Opinion
Ny v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided September 2, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMerrick, J.
Plaintiffs Choeun Ny and Sahoeut Noeun filed separate small claims actions to recover Personal Injury Protection (“PIP”) benefits for injuries allegedly sustained while in a motor vehicle insured by the defendant. The actions were transferred to the regular civil docket and consolidated for trial upon motions by the defendant.
The record indicates that invoices received by the defendant for the plaintiffs’ medical treatments were submitted to a fee review program. At the conclusion of the fee review, the defendant paid the majority of the invoices in full. Payment for two of Ny’s invoices,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- City of Boston v. Aetna Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- McGill v. Auto Ass'n of MichMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- Chipman v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Creswell v. Medical West Community Health Plan, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Shah v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
- Sonogram of New England, Inc. v. Plymouth Rock Assurance Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002
- Barron Chiropractic & Rehabilitation, P.C. v. Norfolk & Dedham GroupMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2013
- Knight v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2004
- Cruickshank v. Commerce InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2004