Legal Opinion

Alamo School District v. Jones

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 1960No. Civ. 18736PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuniway, J.

On January 2, 1878, Mary A. Jones, as first party, conveyed certain land to H. S. Raven and Jas. Foster as trustees of the Alamo Public School District, as second parties. Respondent (plaintiff below) is the successor in interest of the grantees; appellants (defendants below) are the successors in interest of the grantor. The action was brought for the purpose of obtaining a declaratory judgment as to appellants’ rights, if any, under the deed. The pertinent provisions of the deed are as follows: “the said party of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum of Two hundred & fifty…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. In re Estate of WalkerlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Dabney v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Firth v. MarovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Barnett v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Los Angeles Investment Co. v. GaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wong v. Di GraziaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. McDougall v. Palo Alto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Division of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Dick Bullis, Inc.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1977
  4. Strong v. TheisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Johnson v. Ocean Shore Railroad Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API