Legal Opinion
McDougall v. Palo Alto Unified School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 29, 1963No. Civ. 19616PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
We determine here conflicting claims to one-fourth of an award made in condemnation proceedings.
The parcel of land involved is presently located in the City of Palo Alto and formerly, before consolidation of the two municipalities, in the town of Mayfield. On August 31, 1867, William Paul as party of the first part conveyed the land to Joseph N. Spencer, George W. La Peire and Alexander Young, trustees of the Mayfield School District as parties of the second part. Appellants are successors in interest of the grantor. Respondent, a political subdivision of the State of California, is the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Sutphin v. SpeikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Todhunter v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Dabney v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Griffis v. Davidson County Metropolitan GovernmentTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
- Saunders v. New Capital for Small Businesses, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Walton v. City of Red BluffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Great Western Furniture Co. v. Porter Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Briggs v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.