Legal Opinion
Firth v. Marovich
California Supreme Court
Decided June 21, 1911No. L.A. No. 2642PublishedCited by 46 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. George H. Hutton, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
On January 21, 1907, the plaintiff conveyed to Charles Scherer lot 2 in Walnut Park in the city of Los Angeles, by a grant deed containing the following provisions : “This conveyance is made and said real property is sold subject to the following conditions:
“That no building whatever except a private residence with the customary outbuildings, including a private stable, shall be erected, placed, or permitted on said premises or any part thereof, and that such building shall be used as a private residence only, and shall cost, and be reasonably worth, not less than fifteen hundred (1500.00)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Evans v. FossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Quatman v. McCrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Sanborn v. RiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- Boyden v. RobertsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- Meigs v. MilliganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Werner v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Wing v. Forest Lawn Cemetery Assn.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Alderson v. CuttingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Los Angeles & Arizona Land Co. v. MarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Smith v. Second Church of Christ, Scientist, PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1960
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.