Legal Opinion
Pierce v. Mansfield
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 10, 2008No. Civil Action 05-1989 (RMU)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss; Granting the Plaintiff’s Motion to Supplement his Opposition; Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
I. INTRODUCTION
This employment discrimination case comes before the court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. The plaintiff, Keith Pierce, brings this action against the defendant, the Department of Veterans’ Affairs, alleging race discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hairston v. TapellaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Farris v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Hairston v. BoardmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Moore v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
- Niskey v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.