Legal Opinion
Farris v. Clinton
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 12, 2009No. Civil Action 05-1975 (RMU)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Defendant’s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the court on the defendant’s 1 renewed motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff is an Asian-American woman formerly employed by the U.S. Foreign Service, a branch of the U.S. Department of State (“the Department”). She alleges that the defendant unlawfully discriminated against her based on her race and gender and then retaliated against her for complaining about the discrimination. The defendant previously filed a…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Fennell v. AARPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Allen v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Warner v. Vance-CooksDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Pearson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Hutchinson v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.