Legal Opinion

Niskey v. Napolitano

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 29, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-1269PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge

Back in 2002, Lawrence Niskey allegedly experienced unfair treatment at his job. Eight years and several incidents later, Niskey finally filed a formal complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The EEOC denied his claim because Niskey had failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. This Title VII case followed, and the Court will grant [15] the government’s motion to dismiss for the same reason.

BACKGROUND

For purposes of defendant’s motion to dismiss, the Court accepts as true all facts as pleaded in Niskey’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Roy E. Bowden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  4. Soon Y. Park v. Howard UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  5. Forkkio, Samuel E. v. Powell, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lawrence Niskey v. John F. KellyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  2. Niskey v. NielsenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API