Legal Opinion
Hairston v. Boardman
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 16, 2013No. Civil Action No. 08-1531 (RWR)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Kevin Hairston has sued the Public Printer1 of the United States Government Printing Office (“GPO”), under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.Cr § 2000e-16(a), alleging that the GPO failed to promote him because of his race, and denied him training because of his race and as retaliation for prior EEO activity. The GPO has moved for summary judgment. Because Hairston has neither rebutted all of the non-discriminatory reasons the GPO proffered for not promoting him or sending him to training, nor shown that not…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brady v. Office of the Sergeant at ArmsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Rochon, Donald v. Gonzales, AlbertoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Ronald J. Fischbach v. District of Columbia Department of Corrections and Hallem H. Williams, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Stella, Marie v. v. Mineta, Norman Y.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kevin Hairston v. Davita Vance-CooksCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Thomas v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Dyer v. McCormick & Schmick's Seafood Restaurants, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Banks v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Arnold v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.