Legal Opinion
Moore v. Abbott Laboratories
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 7, 2011No. Case 2:05-cv-1065PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MICHAEL H. WATSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff asserts Defendants discriminated against him because of his age by failing to rehire him for several positions after he was' terminated as part of a reduction in force, and that Defendants retaliated against him after he was rehired because he continued to pursue his age discrimination claims, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et sec?., and Ohio Revised Code Chapter 4112. Defendants move for summary judgment. Defs.’ Mot. Summ. J., ECF No. 116. For the reasons that follow, the Court…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mark Charlton-Perkins v. Univ. of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Dunaway v. Univ. of CincinnatiOhio Court of Claims · 2012
- Duane Hill v. Maryland Department of State PoliceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2026
- Gunning v. New York State Justice Center for the Protection of People With Special NeedsDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2023
- McNatt v. Ohio Department of Job and Family ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.