Legal Opinion
Nanlawala v. Jack Carl Associates, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 20, 1987No. 86 C 5343PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM T. HART, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Mohmed (“Mike”) and Amina Nanlawala bring this action against defendants Jack Carl Associates, Inc., a futures commission merchant, and Jeff Atkins and Neal Sears, two employees of Jack Carl. Plaintiffs seek damages under a variety of theories for losses they sustained while trading in commodity futures in two accounts with Jack Carl, a discount trading account (“the Discount Account”) and a second account which began as a discount account but was changed to a full service account (“the Sears Account”). 1 Defendants now…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,437 Hetty Fey v. Walston & Co., Inc., and Robert A. SpiraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Glenn Hill v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields Incorporated, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Frahm v. UrkovichAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Cauble v. Mabon Nugent & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Exchange National Bank v. Farm Bureau Life Insurance Co. of MichiganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Continental Bank, N.A. v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Neptuno Treuhand-Und Verwaltungsgesellschaft Mbh v. ArborAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- In re MF Global Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Continental Bank v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Olmos v. GoldingDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.