Olmos v. Golding
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
Before the court is the motion of defendants, Ronald Golding and Lind-Waldock & Company, brought pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 56(b), for summary judgment on the Second Amended Complaint of plaintiff, Gustavo Olmos. Briefing on this summary judgment motion has spawned two motions by defendants to strike affidavits submitted by Olmos and his attorney, Leslie A. Blau, in support of Plaintiff’s Brief in Opposition to Defendants’ Summary Judgment Motion. The motions to strike are denied and, for the reasons set forth below, summary judgment is entered in favor of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Geldermann and Company, Inc. v. Lane Processing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Nanlawala v. Jack Carl Associates, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Manuel Kaplan, Debtor. Manuel Kaplan Arthur Liebersohn, Trustee v. First Options of Chicago, Inc. Manuel KaplanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- In Re: KaplanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998