Legal Opinion

Neptuno Treuhand-Und Verwaltungsgesellschaft Mbh v. Arbor

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 13, 1998No. 1-95-1864PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Quinn

This case is brought on appeal from a May 19, 1995, order of the circuit court of Cook County, dismissing plaintiffs’ second amended complaint with prejudice, pursuant to section 2 — 615 of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure. 735 ILCS 5/2 — 615 (West 1994).

On appeal, plaintiffs-appellants contend that the trial court erred, as a matter of law, in determining that: (1) defendant-appellee Patrick J. Arbor had no duty to disclose to plaintiffs all material facts known to him relating to Thomas J. Farrell’s fitness to be a commodities futures trader; (2) plaintiffs unreasonably relied on…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Board of Education v. A, C and S, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Rozny v. MarnulIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Witherell v. WeimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Soules v. General Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. First Midwest Bank, N.A. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Schrager v. North Community BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. Doe-2 v. McLean County Unit District No. 5 Board of DirectorsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  4. Greenberger v. GEICO General InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  5. Kopley Group v. L.P. v. Sheridan Edgewater Properties, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API