Frahm v. Urkovich
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor
Plaintiffs brought this action for injunctive relief and damages arising out of a certain real estate transaction. Count III of the amended complaint is brought under the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (111. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 121V2, par. 261 et seq.) (the Act), and alleges that defendant Urkovich, while acting as plaintiffs’ attorney, misrepresented certain facts and failed to disclose other material facts to them in conjunction with said transaction. The trial court dismissed count III for failure to state a cause of action under the Act and plaintiffs…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Scott v. Association for Childbirth at Home, InternationalIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Lightfoot v. MacDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Short v. DemopolisWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Downers Grove Volkswagen, Inc. v. Wigglesworth Imports, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- Hardin, Rodriguez & Boivin Anesthesiologists, Ltd. v. Paradigm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Cripe v. LeiterIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Rubin v. Marshall Field & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.