Legal Opinion

Peters v. Shull

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 1, 1964No. 23981PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, Judge.

This is an action for damages alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff-respondent, Charles Peters, as the result of the defendants-appellants Lee and Isal Shull, having changed the grading and having raised the elevation of portions of their adjoining lot causing surface waters to be artificially collected and discharged in a body on plaintiff’s lot and house causing it to be permanently damaged. The parties waived a jury, and the trial by the court resulted in a judgment for plaintiff for $600.00. After an unavailing motion for a new trial, defendants appealed.

This being a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Haferkamp v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. Clark v. City of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Todd v. York CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Blydenburgh v. AmelungMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. Belveal v. H. B. C. Development Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Looney v. HindmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. Hawkins v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  3. Spain v. City of Cape GirardeauMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Misch v. CB Contracting CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Wells v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API