Peters v. Shull
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HUNTER, Judge.
This is an action for damages alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff-respondent, Charles Peters, as the result of the defendants-appellants Lee and Isal Shull, having changed the grading and having raised the elevation of portions of their adjoining lot causing surface waters to be artificially collected and discharged in a body on plaintiff’s lot and house causing it to be permanently damaged. The parties waived a jury, and the trial by the court resulted in a judgment for plaintiff for $600.00. After an unavailing motion for a new trial, defendants appealed.
This being a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Haferkamp v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Clark v. City of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951
- Todd v. York CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
- Blydenburgh v. AmelungMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
- Belveal v. H. B. C. Development Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Looney v. HindmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Hawkins v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- Spain v. City of Cape GirardeauMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Misch v. CB Contracting CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
- Wells v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.