Legal Opinion

Wells v. State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 10, 1973No. 57447PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRY I. EAGER, Special Commissioner.

In this action the plaintiffs seek damages from the State Highway Commission for the silting and partial filling of a lake on their respective properties. In the first count the Wells are plaintiffs and in the second count the Crowders are the plaintiffs. The contractor on the highway project was originally joined in two additional counts, but a voluntary dismissal as to it was entered as the trial began. The theory of plaintiffs was that their respective properties had been damaged within the meaning of Sec. 26, Art. I of the Missouri Constitution,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Applegate v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. Householder v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  3. Haferkamp v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  4. Van DeVere v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  5. Keener v. SharpSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. DeetzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Looney v. HindmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  3. Roth v. State Highway Commission of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Roberts v. HockerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. SwinkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API