Legal Opinion

Looney v. Hindman

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 26, 1983No. 64078PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKMAR, Judge.

The plaintiffs own a home in Bridgeton, St. Louis County. The defendants’ home adjoins the plaintiffs’ on the south. A fence along the south border of the plaintiffs’ property separates it from the defendants’, and a fence along the west border separates it from that of another neighbor, the Zimmers. The natural drainage in the area is from south to north and from west to east.

When the plaintiffs moved into their house in 1974 they hired a house mover to transport their 20 foot by 40 foot continuous pour steel reinforced concrete swimming pool to their new home, where it was…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Abbott v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. State v. RodgersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  3. Bower v. Hog Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  4. Happy v. KentonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  5. Haferkamp v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Frank v. Environmental Sanitation Management, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  2. Fowler v. Park Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  3. State of Missouri v. Amanda N. BazellSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  4. Pipefitters Welfare Educational Fund v. Westchester Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Pipefitters Welfare Educational Fund v. Westchester Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API