Blydenburgh v. Amelung
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BROADDUS, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiffs, husband and wife, brought this action against defendants, husband and wife, to recover damages alleged to have been caused to their property by defendants artificially impounding and discharging water onto plaintiffs’ property. Trial before the Court and jury resulted in a verdict for plaintiffs for $1,900. Defendants have appealed.
The parties to this litigation are neighboring property owners. Plaintiffs are the owners,of a lot which has a frontage on Troost, a north and south street in Kansas City North, Missouri, of 80 feet, and is 210 feet deep.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Casey v. Wrought Iron Bridge Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1905
- Clark v. City of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951
- Haynor v. Excelsior Springs Light, Power, Heat & Water Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1908
3Cited by20 opinions
- White v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
- La Plant v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
- Haferkamp v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Looney v. HindmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Hawkins v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.