Legal Opinion
Belveal v. H. B. C. Development Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided May 6, 1955No. 22135PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOUR, Corrimissioner.
Lloyd I.-Belveal and. Phyllis M. Belveal, husband and wife, brought this action against H. B. C. Development Company, a corporation, to recover damages for injury to certain property, alleged to have been caused by the destruction of a natural watercourse by defendant, and by other acts of defendant. ■-Verdict and judgment were for plaintiffs in the sum of $4,500, and defendant has appealed.
Defendant contends that the court erred in giving plaintiffs’ main instruction (No. 1), because it contained hypotheses not supported by the evidence. In determining the sufficiency of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ambrose v. M. F. A. Co-Operative Ass'n of St. ElizabethSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Hoyt v. City of HudsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- Yates v. ManchesterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- Benson v. Chicago & Alton RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Happy v. KentonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Spain v. City of Cape GirardeauMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Kelso v. C. B. K. Agronomics, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- Beeler v. Board of Adjustment of City of JoplinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
- Kueffer v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Jones v. Des Moines & Mississippi River Levee District No. 1Missouri Court of Appeals · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.