Legal Opinion

Clark v. City of Springfield

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 1951No. 6975PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

241 S.W.2d 100 (1951)

CLARK et al.

v.

CITY OF SPRINGFIELD.

No. 6975.

Springfield Court of Appeals. Missouri.

May 8, 1951.

Howard C. Potter, Meredith B. Turner, Springfield, Ray E. Watson of Watson, Richart & Titus, Joplin, for appellant.

Kirby W. Patterson, Springfield, for respondent.

VANDEVENTER, Presiding Judge.

This is a suit for damages alleged to have been sustained by plaintiffs (respondents) by reason of a nuisance maintained by defendant-appellant. The nuisance was alleged to be caused by the overflow of surface and sewage waters onto and across plaintiffs' land. From a judgment in favor of…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Paddock v. SomesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  2. Abbott v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  3. Pearson v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  4. Conner v. NeiswenderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  5. Shelley v. Ozark Pipe Line CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Frank v. Environmental Sanitation Management, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  2. White v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Bower v. Hog Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  4. Haferkamp v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  5. Hoffman v. KoehlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API