Legal Opinion

Herdt v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1995No. 93-209PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Justice.

Michael Herdt appeals a jury conviction for first degree sexual assault. Through counsel, he presents a single issue concerning whether he was denied the constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel in the context of whether statements made during trial constituted a waiver of his right to testify on his own behalf. Herdt additionally filed a pro se brief in which he raises a

number of additional issues concerning whether or not he received a fair trial.

We affirm.

ISSUES

In the brief prepared by counsel, Herdt raises the following issue:

I.Whether the appellant’s…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Hopkinson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Momon v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Lancaster v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Bloomquist v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Chapman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Asch v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API