Lancaster v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VOIGT, Justice.
[T1] James Norman Lancaster appeals his convictions for the first-degree premeditated murder of Dana Penn and the attempted first-degree premeditated murder of Monte Hanson. Finding harmless error in the trial court's admission into evidence of a videotaped re-enactment of the crimes, finding either no error or harmless error in the allegations of prosecutorial misconduct, and finding that defense counsel was not ineffective in failing to file a motion to suppress evidence, we affirm.
ISSUES
[12] Three issues are presented in this appeal: -
ISSUE I
Whether the district court erred…
2Cases cited89 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Tome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. Vincent Anthony PerdueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Dysthe v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Wilks v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Schreibvogel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Byron Nelson Griggs v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
- Asch v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.