Bloomquist v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MACY, Justice.
Appellant James Bloomquist appeals from his conviction for aggravated vehicular homicide.
We affirm.
ISSUES
Appellant presents several issues for our review:
Issue I
Did the trial court abuse its discretion and deny Appellant the right to confront an adverse witness when it ruled that the State’s expert witness was unavailable and admitted the witness’ videotaped deposition into evidence?
Issue II
Was the Appellant denied his constitutional right to a unanimous verdict?
Issue III
Was Appellant denied effective assistance of counsel due to trial counsel’s deficient performance?
Issue IV
Did…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wilson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- McClellan v. TottenhoffWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- Mentock v. MentockWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- State v. Adams (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- Lancaster v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. JonesHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. HummelUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- Duke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.