Legal Opinion

Bloomquist v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1996No. 95-65PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant James Bloomquist appeals from his conviction for aggravated vehicular homicide.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Appellant presents several issues for our review:

Issue I

Did the trial court abuse its discretion and deny Appellant the right to confront an adverse witness when it ruled that the State’s expert witness was unavailable and admitted the witness’ videotaped deposition into evidence?

Issue II

Was the Appellant denied his constitutional right to a unanimous verdict?

Issue III

Was Appellant denied effective assistance of counsel due to trial counsel’s deficient performance?

Issue IV

Did…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Wilson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  4. McClellan v. TottenhoffWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Mentock v. MentockWyoming Supreme Court · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. State v. Adams (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Lancaster v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. JonesHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. HummelUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Duke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API