Legal Opinion

Rock v. Arkansas

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 22, 1987No. 86-130PublishedCited by 2,053 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blackmun

The issue presented in this case is whether Arkansas’ evidentiary rule prohibiting the admission of hypnotically refreshed testimony violated petitioner’s constitutional right to testify on her own behalf as a defendant in a criminal case.

I

Petitioner Vickie Lorene Rock was charged with manslaughter in the death of her husband, Frank Rock, on July 2, 1983. A dispute had been simmering about Frank’s wish to move from the couple’s small apartment adjacent to Vickie’s beauty parlor to a trailer she owned outside town. That night a fight erupted when Frank refused to let petitioner eat some pizza…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2,053 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. DunniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States v. SchefferSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

2,048 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API