Legal Opinion

Momon v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 2000PublishedCited by 806 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, Justice.

The appellant, Napoleon Momon, requested permission to appeal from a decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals holding that he was not denied effective assistance of counsel when his trial counsel failed to allow him to testify at his own trial. After careful consideration, we find it unnecessary to reach the issue of whether the facts of this case give rise to a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Instead we hold that a criminal defendant’s right to testify is a fundamental constitutional right guaranteed both by Article I, section 9 of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited117 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by806 opinions

  1. State v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. RiceTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Edward Thomas Kendrick, III v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State of Tennessee v. Carl J. WagnerTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Henry Zillon Felts v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2011

801 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API