Asch v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VOIGT, Justice.
[¶ 1] A jury convicted David Asch (Asch) of possession of a felony amount of methamphetamine, in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 36-7-1031 (LexisNexis 2001). In this appeal, Asch contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel, that the district court improperly instructed the jury after a witness refused to answer a question, and that he was denied his right to due process of law when he was forced to appear before the jury in shackles.
[¶ 2] We reverse.
ISSUES
[¶ 3] Six issues have been identified by the parties:
1. Was Asch’s right to effective assistance of counsel…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Duke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Guy v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Teniente v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Bartley v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
- Urbigkit v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.