Legal Opinion
Chapman v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided March 5, 2001No. 99-125PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEHMAN, Chief Justice.
[¶1] A Sweetwater County jury found Carl Thomas Chapman guilty of two counts of indecent liberties with a minor and two counts of third degree sexual assault. He appeals those convictions on the grounds that the district court committed various eviden-tiary and procedural errors during trial and sentencing and that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. Finding no such errors, we affirm.
ISSUES
[¶2] Chapman raises five claims of error: 1. Did reversible error occur when the court allowed expert testimony on the theory of childhood sexual abuse and post traumatic…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Schreibvogel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. ScottTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- Burton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Hannon v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Asch v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.