Legal Opinion

Bause v. Anthony Pools, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 13, 1962No. Civ. 26073PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBalthis, J.

Defendant built a swimming pool for plaintiff at his Rolling Hills home. Several months after completion plaintiff found that the pool leaked and that there were other defects; after complaints made to defendant which were not solved or adjusted, plaintiff sued to recover damages for faulty construction of the pool.

After a trial by the court, judgment was for plaintiff. Defendant moved for a new trial which was denied. Defendant appeals from the judgment and the order denying the motion for a new trial.

The order denying the motion for a new trial is not an appealable order. (Rodriguez v.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stewart v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Rodriguez v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. People Ex Rel. Dept. of Public Works v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Brown v. AguilarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Shell v. SchmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sabella v. WislerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. MURRAY'S IRON WORKS, INC. v. BoyceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro v. SchectmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Yurchak v. Jack Boiman Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Tolstoy Constructor Co. v. MinterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API