Legal Opinion

Yurchak v. Jack Boiman Construction Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1981No. C-800830PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This contract action arose out of a transaction between Michael Yurchak, plaintiff-appellee, and Jack Boiman Construction Company and Jack Boiman, defendants-appellants.. On May 7,1977, the parties entered into a written agreement whereby defendants undertook to waterproof plaintiff's basement. Central to the contract was defendants’ guaranty that the basement would be waterproof for ten years. Plaintiff paid defendants $2,400, leaving a balance of $800 to be paid upon the job’s completion. After defendants had finished their work, but before plaintiff could make final payment, it rained, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Economy Swimming Pool Co. v. FreelingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  2. Bause v. Anthony Pools, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Union Pipe & MacHinery Ltd. v. Luria Steel & Trading Corporation, Luria Steel & Trading Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Union Pipe & MacHinery Ltd., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grine v. Chambers (In Re Grine)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
  2. Economou v. Physicians Weight Loss Centers of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1991
  3. Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. BenderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984
  5. Coliadis v. Holko Enercon, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API