Rodriguez v. Barnett
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
The defendant 1 appeals from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs for $1,500 and from an order denying his motion for new trial. This order is not appealable. The appeal was dismissed from the bench with an admonition from the Chief Justice to counsel and to members of the bar generally to cease appealing from.such an obviously nonappealable order.
The $1,500 represents the deposit paid by the plaintiffs as purchasers pursuant to a written agreement and deposit re ceipt executed by the parties covering the purchase of certain real property for subdivision purposes located in San Bernardino…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mattei v. HopperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Robbins v. Pacific Eastern Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Sunset Securities Co. v. Coward McCann, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1957
3Cited by107 opinions
- Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLPCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Walker v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Markley v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Boyd v. BevilacquaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Moss Development Co. v. GearyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.