Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro v. Schectman

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 19, 1997No. A071451PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAMBDEN, J.

Steven Schectman and Law Offices of Pinnock & Schectman (Schectman) appeal from the order granting a preliminary injunction requiring them to turn over documents that were removed from Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro (PM&S).

PM&S brought an action against Schectman for specific recovery of personal property and for temporary, preliminary, and permanent injunctive relief. The complaint alleges Schectman gained possession of confidential personnel documents removed from the offices of PM&S without its consent. Schectman represents current and former PM&S employees in connection with…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. IT Corp. v. County of ImperialCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Chronicle Publishing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. American Civil Liberties Union v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Fmc Corporation v. Capital Cities/abc, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Andrews v. Foster Wheeler LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. In Re Providian Credit Card CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. County of Fresno v. SheltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Baxter v. Genworth N. Am. Corp., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. Simms v. NPCK Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API