Legal Opinion
Shell v. Schmidt
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 20, 1958No. Civ. 17407PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ST. CLAIR, J. pro tem. *
Defendant appeals from a judgment against him in the amount of $47,400 in favor of the 24 plaintiffs.
The defendant is a builder-contractor. Plaintiffs are third party beneficiaries of a contract between the defendant and the United States Government and sue for a breach thereof.
Plaintiffs, 12 couples, bought similar houses in a tract built by defendant. The complaint originally alleged causes of action for fraudulent misrepresentation and breach of contract. On a prior appeal, the court held that the causes of action for fraudulent misrepresentation were not proved as…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Shell v. SchmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. StuardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Perry v. QuackenbushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Thomas Haverty Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Seely v. AldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Harrison v. McMillanMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
- H.L.C. & Associates Construction Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Blecick v. School District No. 18 of Cochise CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Jones v. KvistadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.