Legal Opinion

Sabella v. Wisler

California Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1963No. S. F. 21146PublishedCited by 198 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITE, J. †

Defendant J. W. Wisler, the builder of a home found to have been negligently constructed upon an improperly compacted lot, appeals from a judgment in the amount of $8,200 in favor .of plaintiff-owners Luciano and Diane Sabella for extensive damages sustained to their home as-' a result of subsidence of the supportive and nearby earth. The Sabellas appeal from that portion of the judgment decreeing that defendant National Union-Fire Insurance Company, which had issued an “all physical loss” policy upon their home excluding coverage for loss by settling, cracking, shrinkage . : .…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Brooks v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Stewart v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Ransom v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Dow v. Holly Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1958

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by198 opinions

  1. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Fu-Kong Tzung Jean Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Does 1 Through 100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PartridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Garvey v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1989

193 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API