Legal Opinion

MURRAY'S IRON WORKS, INC. v. Boyce

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 15, 2008No. H030146PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELIA, J.

This case involves a suit for breach of a contract to build and install decorative ironwork at the residence of appellant Phillip R. Boyce (hereafter Boyce). Plaintiff, Murray’s Iron Works, Inc. (hereafter MIW), sought $66,222.44 in damages together with interest thereon and requested attorney fees and cost of suit from Boyce. Boyce cross-complained. Eventually, on January 17, 2006, the matter proceeded to jury trial. On January 23, 2006, Boyce filed a motion for nonsuit pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 581c, subdivision (a). Ultimately, the court denied the motion…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Nally v. Grace Community ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. Superior Court (Zamudio)California Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  5. People v. HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Chicago Title Insurance v. AMZ Insurance Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. A.M. v. Albertsons, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Yassin v. SolisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Scott v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. EEL River Disposal & Resource Recovery Inc. v. County of HumboldtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API