Beebe v. DeMarco
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
RIGGS, P. J. pro tempore.
Defendants appeal from a judgment determining that plaintiff has acquired a prescriptive easement for a 12-foot-wide roadway across defendants’ property and permanently enjoining defendants from obstructing or hindering use of the easement. Plaintiff cross-appeals, arguing that the easement should be 19 feet wide. We affirm on the appeal and write only to address defendants’ arguments that plaintiffs use was not continuous or adverse and that the trial court erred in allowing plaintiff to enter the easement to make certain repairs. We affirm on the cross-appeal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thompson v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Feldman Et Ux. v. Knapp Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Kondor v. ProseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- House v. HagerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Hay v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- R & C. RANCH, LLC v. KundeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Petersen v. Crook CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Montagne v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Webb v. ClodfelterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Foster Auto Parts, Inc. v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000