Montagne v. Elliott
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.
Appellant James Elliott appeals a judgment in these consolidated actions that include claims for prescriptive easement rights and to enforce maintenance obligations involving a private roadway. The judgment declared that respondents Montagnes, Pakes, Wests, and Weisels have prescriptive easements in portions of a road that crosses appellant’s property, enjoined appellant from unlawfully interfering with respondents’ use of the easements, and required appellant to pay the Weisels a portion of the maintenance costs for the road. The judgment was entered after a trial on remand from our decision…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rennie v. Freeway TransportOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Thompson v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Feldman Et Ux. v. Knapp Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Thompson v. SchuhOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Faulconer v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lieberfreund v. GregoryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Trautman v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Webb v. ClodfelterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Beers v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Motes v. PacifiCorpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.