Legal Opinion

Montagne v. Elliott

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 9, 2004No. 90-382-L-2, 93-3033-E-2; A118313PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Appellant James Elliott appeals a judgment in these consolidated actions that include claims for prescriptive easement rights and to enforce maintenance obligations involving a private roadway. The judgment declared that respondents Montagnes, Pakes, Wests, and Weisels have prescriptive easements in portions of a road that crosses appellant’s property, enjoined appellant from unlawfully interfering with respondents’ use of the easements, and required appellant to pay the Weisels a portion of the maintenance costs for the road. The judgment was entered after a trial on remand from our decision…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rennie v. Freeway TransportOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Thompson v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Feldman Et Ux. v. Knapp Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Thompson v. SchuhOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Faulconer v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lieberfreund v. GregoryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. Trautman v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. Webb v. ClodfelterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. Beers v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. Motes v. PacifiCorpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API