Foster Auto Parts, Inc. v. City of Portland
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Defendant City of Portland appeals from a judgment that held that plaintiff has a prescriptive easement in a private driveway that joins a city road. Defendant argues that plaintiff has no right to the easement, in part because plaintiff failed to secure a permit for the driveway in violation of relevant municipal ordinances and state statutes. On de novo review, we affirm.
Plaintiff owns and operates a large business located at 103rd Avenue and Foster Road in Portland. Beginning in 1962, plaintiff used a dirt and gravel driveway as one means of access to its property from Foster Road. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thompson v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Feldman Et Ux. v. Knapp Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Thompson v. SchuhOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Smejkal v. Empire Lite-Rock, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Baylink v. ReesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- R & C. RANCH, LLC v. KundeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Motes v. PacifiCorpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Drayton v. City of Lincoln CityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Boyer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017