Legal Opinion

Foster Auto Parts, Inc. v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 6, 2000No. 960201274; CA A98658PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Defendant City of Portland appeals from a judgment that held that plaintiff has a prescriptive easement in a private driveway that joins a city road. Defendant argues that plaintiff has no right to the easement, in part because plaintiff failed to secure a permit for the driveway in violation of relevant municipal ordinances and state statutes. On de novo review, we affirm.

Plaintiff owns and operates a large business located at 103rd Avenue and Foster Road in Portland. Beginning in 1962, plaintiff used a dirt and gravel driveway as one means of access to its property from Foster Road. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thompson v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Feldman Et Ux. v. Knapp Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Thompson v. SchuhOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Smejkal v. Empire Lite-Rock, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Baylink v. ReesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. R & C. RANCH, LLC v. KundeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. Motes v. PacifiCorpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. Drayton v. City of Lincoln CityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. Boyer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API