Hay v. Stevens
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, C.J.
This is a suit in which plaintiffs seek to establish a prescriptive easement in the form of several pathways across defendants’ land. Defendants appeal from a decree in favor of plaintiffs.
Defendants own a parcel of land at Cannon Beach, Oregon, between plaintiffs’ land and the beach. Plaintiffs purchased one parcel of their property (Lot 4) from a Mrs. Morrison and an adjoining parcel (Lot 5) from a Mr. and Mrs. Wolff. Plaintiffs and their predecessors in title to both parcels used the pathways above to get to the public part of the beach.
The only question on appeal is the sufficiency of the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Norgard v. Busher Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Springer v. DURRETTE ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Knecht v. SPAKEOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Application of HouseAlaska Supreme Court · 1960
3Cited by14 opinions
- Kondor v. ProseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Arrien v. LevangerOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Wels v. HippeOregon Supreme Court · 2017
- Montagne v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Hay v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.