Kondor v. Prose
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
Defendants appeal from a decree declaring that plaintiffs have an easement by prescription over a certain road through defendants’ property which provides the only existing access to plaintiffs’ parcel. Defendants contend that the ten-year prescriptive period (ORS 12.050) was interrupted by erection of a gate across the road in question and that the plaintiffs failed to prove that use of the road by their predecessors and others was sufficiently continuous and adverse to defendants’ rights to satisfy the elements of prescription. Defendants further assign error to fixing the scope of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thompson v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Feldman Et Ux. v. Knapp Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Thompson v. SchuhOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Trewin v. HunterOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Arrien v. LevangerOregon Supreme Court · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- R & C. RANCH, LLC v. KundeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Sutherlin School District 130 v. HerreraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Montagne v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Read v. DokeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Baylink v. ReesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.