Legal Opinion

Petersen v. Crook County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 17, 2001No. 97 CV 0010; CA A106446PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment declaring the existence of a public prescriptive easement in favor of defendant Crook County (the county) and private prescriptive easements in favor of intervenors along a portion of a roadway crossing plaintiffs’ property. On de novo review, we reverse.

The testimony at trial often was vague and confusing. We summarize the most persuasive evidence as follows. Plaintiffs own and reside on rural property near Prineville that they purchased in 1991. A graveled roadway of about 15 feet in width, known as Peppermint Lane, crosses plaintiffs’ property along its…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thompson v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Woods v. HartOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Wood v. WoodcockOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Trewin v. HunterOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. House v. HagerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Frady v. FradyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. Arlington Education Ass'n v. Arlington School District No. 3Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. Kutz v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. Martin v. G. B. Enterprises, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API