Legal Opinion
Schloss v. Jamison
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided June 12, 1964No. 247PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
Evidence was offered by plaintiffs and by defendants. The court’s findings of fact cover sixteen pages of the record. Facts established by unchallenged findings may be summarized as follows:
On January 29, 1962, the City Council of Charlotte adopted a new and comprehensive zoning ordinance. This ordinance, which became effective January 30, 1962, is now identified as Chapter 23 of the Code of the City of Charlotte. It establishes within the corporate limits of the City of Charlotte and its “Perimeter Area” three “Residential Districts,” two “Office Districts,” three “Business Districts,” and…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Grant v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Murphy, Inc. v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- United Advertising Corp. v. Borough of RaritanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Sunad, Inc. v. City of SarasotaSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Blades v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- E. B. Elliott Adv. Co., Henry F. Hill, Intervenor-Appellant v. Metropolitan Dade County, a Political Subdivision of the State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- A-S-P Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- John Donnelly & Sons, Inc. v. Outdoor Advertising BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Zopfi v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.